there is too much responsibility placed on the survivor or horrors
i’m taking ab psych and it’s more than disappointing to find that my PhD professor teaches how to diagnose the mood, eating, and other mental disorders, but places an emphasis of healing on the individual without an equal emphasis on the need for the rest of society to acknowledge and be accountable for the suffering of the individual diagnosed with the “disorders”. also, that the level of disorders can range from low to high level of intensity was only mentioned once and little emphasis was placed on the significance of that range.
while i can see that ab psych is only a low level class, is it not pertinent to teach critical thinking on such issues to present as much of the whole picture as possible? can there be a more integrated level of teaching rather than allow the class, a majority of whom carry the preconceived, society-conditioned notion that it is the individual who is solely responsible for his/her “disorder”?
because while disorders such as schizophrenia and depression can have more of a genetic component than eating disorders, it would be remiss to present such disorders without emphasizing the significance of the environmental factors that contribute to the manifestation of such disorders.
a supporting example would be alcoholism. if alcoholism runs in your family, it is in your genes and thus you are more proned to alcoholism. however, there is empirical evidence done with identical twins with such a predisposition who were raised in different environments, one with alcohol as a prevalent part of life and the other without such an importance on alcohol.
the one who grew up without the influence of alcohol did not have problems with alcohol and the one who was raised in an environment with alcohol presented with alcohol abuse and dependence/addiction.
furthermore, other studies have shown that those without a genetic predisposition to alcohol can become addicted to alcohol when raised in an environment with alcohol, while those with a genetic predisposition to alcohol raised in a family without alcohol did not abuse or become dependent on alcohol.
both studies demonstrate that alcohol abuse or addiction is not solely dependent on one’s genetic predisposition. i think they even show that the environment has a larger influence on development than what we have been conditioned to think.
babies are born without a fully developed brain. evolution has deemed that survival is optimized when the baby can learn and develop, its brain flexible (called plasticity). the baby, without a fully developed brain at birth has room to grow and adapt to its environment.
a baby who is not exposed to light within it’s first few months out of the womb fails to develop rods and cones sufficient to absorb colors and light, thus becomes blind. the faculty for language is developed and enhanced when the baby is exposed to verbal communication, and underdeveloped when lacking such stimulation.
basically, i’m saying this to emphasize, re-state, reiterate, repeat, that it is not all on us. we developed/suffer (a) mental disorder(s) because our environment, our experiences were/are so fucked up that our bodies and minds have developed ways to cope via these “disorders”, but it is not because we were born to be this way.
MORE ON THIS LATER. must bolt to go to my volunteer gig.
much love and care.